COMMUNICATION, TRANSLATION, INTERCULTURE
- Overview
- Assessment methods
- Learning objectives
- Contents
- Bibliography
- Delivery method
- Teaching methods
- Contacts/Info
None
The exam will take place in oral form on the contents of the course. In addition to the study of the texts in the program, will also be evaluated the ability to deepen a theme, and the ability to link different aspects, and to move between different disciplines. Those who do not attend the program, and are kindly requested to contact the teacher.
The aim of the course is to explore the world of myth and its declinations, as a device for accessing and communicating today’s mass culture. Knowing the "fortune" of myth, in its various meanings, and entering the "workshop" of its construction, is in fact an important tool of inter-cultural and inter-media theory and practice. For this reason, the lessons intend to range in different directions, departing from the aesthetic-philosophical up to the socio-anthropological, from the psychoanalytical up to the historical-political, from the theological up to the artistic, from the literary up to the visual. It is within the network traced by these paths (and others to be discovered) that the mass media question of the "icons of the twentieth century" finds - as we shall see - its main road.
The lessons will be aimed at analyzing – through the reading and commentary of some key passages borrowed from canonical texts (Barthes, Benjamin, Herder, Jung, Kafka, Nietzsche) – the construction of the mythological dimension, in all its potential and in its most internal contradictions. On this basis we can examine some typical examples of cultural icons: from the figures of the angels in Raphael's “Madonna Sistina” (Bloch) to the Nordic mythology of eternal youth (Herder); from the rebirth of Dionysus to the literary transposition of some socio-political figures (e. g. from the sorcerer to the populist leader); from the description of the Nymph in Renaissance paintings (in Warburg) to the literary transposition of grace represented by Jacquelin Kennedy (in the novels of Jelinek) or the beauty of Marilyn Monroe (in pop-art); from the Nietzschean “Übermensch” to the figure of Superman; from the rats that populate Kafka's tales (but even before the Grimm brothers' tales) to the Mickey Mouse that Benjamin talks about, or that represent the drama of the Shoah in the Graphic-novel entitled “Maus” by Spiegelmann, or that (even in their hybridisms) we find in some cinematic examples (e.g., the "Kafka", the "Kafka", the "Kafka", the "Grimm", the "Kafka", the "Grimm", the "Grimm"). Mon oncle d'Amerique by Resnais).
In the exploration of the re-elaborations of myths and parameters (in a cross step of memory and oblivion) we discover unsuspected “elective affinities” between apparently distant environments. This happens because mythological icons, adopting an "aesthetic disposition", have been able to emancipate themselves from their original "pedestal" to contaminate themselves with other cultural forms, thus gaining their own important field of action in that symbolic heritage from which both the journalistic register and the collective imagination draw.
At the student's choice 3 (three) texts (or groups of theses) among those listed below:
1) J.G. Herder, Iduna, or the Apple of Rejuvenation [Iduna o il pomo del ringiovanimento], ETS, Pisa 2019 (forthcoming).
2) Fr. Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy [La nascita della tragedia], Adelphi, Milan.
3) Fr. Kafka, Tales [Racconti] (Prometheus; Josephine the Singer, or The Mouse Folk; Investigations of a Dog, The Metamorphosis, A Report to an Academy, A Fasting Artist, A Little Fable, The Wish to be a Red Indian, An Old Manuscript), edition to choose.
4) R. Musil, Posthumous Papers of a Living Author [Pagine postume pubblicate in vita], Einaudi, Turin (only some essays that will be indicated in class).
5) W. Benjamin, Mickey Mouse, Il melangolo, Genova + A. Spiegelman, Maus, Einaudi, Turin.
6) L. Wittgenstein, Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough [Note sul Ramo d’oro di Frazer], Adelphi, Milan.
7) R. Barthes, Mythologies [Miti d’oggi], Einaudi, Turin.
8. C. G. Jung-K. Kerényi, Prolegomena to the Scientific Study of Mythology [Prolegomeni allo studio scientifico della mitologia], Turin, Bollati Boringhieri,
1999.
9) E. Jelinek, Jackie, La Nave di Teseo, Milan.
10) C. Hauke, I. Alister (ed.), Jung & Film. Post-Jungian Takes on the Moving Image [Jung e il cinema], Mimesis, Milan-Udine 2018.
11) A. Kiefer, L’arte sopravvivrà alle sue rovine, Milan, Feltinelli 2018.
For those who do not attend the classes, we require the integration of the book G. Dorfles, New Rites, New Myths, [Nuovi riti, nuovi miti], Skira OR of U. Eco, Apocalypse Postponed [Apocalittici e integrati], Bompiani, Milano.
The teacher reserves the right to indicate any additional material during the lessons, or to modify any text if the editorial circumstances require it (or if it is out of print).
The course, articulated on 8 cfu, provides for a temporal arc of 64 hours of frontal lessons. Each lesson includes moments of discussion and confrontation. It is also intended to use slides and films as teaching material.
The teacher will meet the students at the end of her lessons or by appointment, and can be contacted, also for further information, by email: micaela.latini@uninsubria.it